There are performances that imitate greatness, and then there are performances that become it. In Tyson (2025), Jamie Foxx doesn’t play Mike Tyson — he channels him. Under the unflinching direction of Martin Scorsese and the psychological sharpness of Scott Silver’s screenplay, this isn’t just a boxing biopic. It’s a study of rage, redemption, and the fragile humanity behind the myth of Iron Mike.

From the very first scene — a young Tyson shadowboxing under the flicker of a streetlight in Brooklyn — the film hits like a punch to the soul. Scorsese’s camera doesn’t glamorize the violence; it interprets it, capturing every swing as both survival and confession. We see a boy fighting ghosts long before he ever steps into a ring.

Jamie Foxx’s transformation is staggering. His Tyson isn’t merely physical — though the physique, the lisp, and the coiled menace are uncanny — it’s spiritual. He captures the contradictions that made Tyson legendary: the predator and the poet, the champion and the child, the man who could destroy anyone but himself. There’s a quiet, almost sacred pain behind every glare, every roar of victory, every tear shed in the dim solitude of a hotel room.

Opposite him, Samuel L. Jackson delivers one of his most riveting late-career turns as Don King — a serpent wrapped in silk, whose grin hides both brilliance and betrayal. Jackson’s King isn’t a caricature; he’s a capitalist prophet, spinning Tyson’s fury into fortune while feeding the very demons that would consume him. Their scenes together crackle like electricity — a masterclass in manipulation and magnetism.

The film’s structure mirrors the rhythm of a fight: the rise, the fury, the stumble, the silence. Scorsese frames the boxing sequences with operatic intensity, but it’s the stillness between rounds that devastates. In one unforgettable moment, Tyson stares into his reflection after a title defense — sweat dripping, crowd roaring — and whispers, “I don’t know who I am without the fight.” It’s not a line; it’s a confession.

Ludwig Göransson’s score amplifies every heartbeat. His drums echo like war cries, his strings weep like wounds. The soundtrack becomes an extension of Tyson’s psyche — symphonic chaos, pulsing with both triumph and tragedy.

Silver’s writing pierces deep, refusing to sanitize or sensationalize. We see the violence, yes, but also the vulnerability: the boy who loved pigeons, the man who never stopped searching for peace, the soul who mistook power for purpose.

Scorsese’s fingerprints are everywhere — the kinetic editing, the moral dissonance, the descent into glittering corruption. But there’s also empathy. He doesn’t judge Tyson; he witnesses him, allowing the audience to feel the ache beneath the armor. It’s not about absolution — it’s about understanding the impossible duality of being both hero and horror.

By the time the final bell rings, Tyson (2025) leaves you not exhilarated, but hollowed — the way only truth can. The camera lingers on Foxx’s battered face, eyes searching for something beyond redemption. It’s not victory he finds, but acceptance.

In the pantheon of sports films, Tyson stands alone. It’s not a story of glory — it’s a requiem for control. A reminder that sometimes the greatest fight of all isn’t in the ring, but within.

Raw, poetic, and profoundly human, Tyson (2025) lands every emotional punch — and when the lights fade, it’s not the crowd you’ll remember. It’s the man who finally stopped swinging, a

Related movies: