LAMMY CAUGHT LYING? THE “U-TURN” OF THE CENTURY!

 LAMMY CAUGHT LYING? THE “U-TURN” OF THE CENTURY!
You cannot make this up! David Lammy is now claiming he “warned” Keir Starmer against appointing Peter Mandelson. But the internet has the receipts!
Video evidence shows Lammy praising Mandelson to the skies just weeks ago. Now that the scandal has exploded, he is rewriting history to save his own skin. Critics are calling it the ultimate hypocrisy as Labour turn on each other. With Ed Miliband and Angela Rayner circling for the leadership, is this the end of the Starmer project?
The video proof that exposes Lammy’s desperate flip-flop
See details in the first comment

A new wave of online debate has emerged after public comments made by David Lammy about Peter Mandelson appeared to conflict with earlier footage now circulating widely on social media.

In recent remarks, Lammy said he had previously expressed concerns about the idea of Mandelson taking on a prominent public role. However, several users quickly shared video clips from only weeks earlier in which Lammy is seen speaking very positively about Mandelson’s experience and contribution, describing him as a respected and effective figure.

The contrast between the two statements has led to accusations that Lammy is attempting to distance himself from a decision that has since become controversial. Critics argue that the newly surfaced footage raises questions about whether his latest comments accurately reflect his position at the time.

Supporters, meanwhile, say short video clips taken out of context can be misleading and that opinions may legitimately change as new information becomes available.

The situation has added fresh pressure on the wider leadership team, which is already facing internal debate following recent developments. Online commentators have begun speculating about future leadership dynamics, with several senior figures being mentioned as possible contenders should the current leadership face further challenges.

So far, Lammy has not directly responded to the circulating footage.
What remains clear is that the video evidence has reignited public scrutiny — and intensified discussion over transparency, consistency, and accountability among senior public figures.