For YEARS we watched Minneapolis burn, we watched innocent businesses get destroyed, we watched police officers get attacked, and we watched the so called “leaders” stand there smiling, making excuses, and pouring gasoline on the fire. And the whole time they told the rest of America we were the problem for being angry about it. They called us extremists for wanting law and order, they called us racist for wanting safe streets, and they acted like the chaos was some kind of righteous movement instead of exactly what it was, violent destruction.
Now here’s the question nobody in the media wants to ask out loud… if Jacob Frey allegedly incited violence, should he be arrested like anyone else would be? Because let’s be real, if a normal citizen encouraged violence, encouraged riots, encouraged people to “take it to the streets,” they’d be in handcuffs before the day was over. But when it’s a politician, when it’s one of THEIR people, suddenly the rules change. Suddenly there’s no accountability, no consequences, no justice, just excuses, headlines, and cover ups.
This is exactly why Americans are furious. Because we are living under a two tier system where the powerful are protected and the regular people are punished. And if this country is ever going to be saved, it starts with one simple principle, the law applies to everyone, even mayors, even politicians, even the people who think they’re untouchable.
Fresh controversy has erupted around Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, as critics renew claims that city leadership failed to prevent violence and widespread destruction during periods of unrest in recent years.
Opponents argue that political messaging at the time contributed to an atmosphere in which businesses were damaged, police officers were attacked and public order deteriorated. Some campaigners are now openly asking whether senior officials, including the mayor, should face formal investigation over decisions and public statements made during the crisis.
Supporters of Frey strongly reject the accusations, saying the unrest was driven by complex national tensions and that city leaders worked under extreme and unpredictable conditions. They insist there is no evidence that the mayor encouraged violence.
The renewed debate reflects a wider national argument over public safety, political responsibility and whether elected officials are held to the same standards as ordinary citizens when major disorder occurs.
