A renewed political dispute has emerged in Westminster following confirmation that Lucy Connelly, who was previously jailed over a social media post relating to mass deportations, is due to be released next week.

Connelly’s case has attracted significant public attention in recent months, with supporters arguing that her prosecution represents an excessive response to online speech. An online fundraising campaign linked to her legal and personal costs has raised more than £157,000, according to figures displayed on the public appeal page.

The timing of her release has intensified political scrutiny, coming just days before a scheduled House of Commons debate on free expression, online harm and the use of existing public order and communications laws. Several MPs from across parties are expected to raise concerns about how current legislation is being applied to online comments and political speech.

Government sources said ministers continue to stand by the legal framework used to prosecute cases involving online content that is considered threatening, abusive or likely to incite hostility. Officials stress that decisions to charge individuals are made independently by prosecutors and are not directed by politicians.

However, campaigners backing Connelly argue that her case illustrates a wider problem in the policing of speech. They claim that vague legal thresholds and inconsistent enforcement risk undermining public confidence in free expression protections.

Senior figures in Westminster acknowledge that the case has become a focal point in the broader national debate over where the line should be drawn between protecting communities from harm and safeguarding political and personal speech. Several MPs have privately said the public reaction to Connelly’s imprisonment has exposed deep divisions over how online speech laws are being interpreted.

Downing Street declined to comment directly on Connelly’s release, but reiterated that the government supports freedom of expression while also maintaining that the law must protect individuals and groups from harassment and serious abuse.

The upcoming parliamentary debate is expected to focus on possible reforms to existing legislation, guidance for police and prosecutors, and greater clarity on how free speech principles are balanced with public order and safety.