“Safe Skyscraper” Broadcast Under Criminal Review as Forensic Teams Analyze Live Feed and Audio

The investigation into the “Safe Skyscraper” broadcast has taken a horrific turn as digital forensic teams analyze the live feed that was beamed to millions of homes globally. Despite the title claiming a “safe” climb, the recovered audio from the broadcast contains subtle, easily missed sounds of mechanical distress and muffled voices that experts say do not belong to the climber. This suggests that the live stream may have been manipulated in real-time to hide a much more dangerous reality unfolding on the side of the building.
The images of Honnold clinging to the massive circular structures of the facade are now being used as evidence in what authorities are calling a “criminal case of the highest order.” There are signs of deliberate structural tampering found near the points where Honnold made his ascent, leading to fears that the entire event was a cover for a breach of the building’s internal systems. One source within the investigation stated that the “implications are enormous,” hinting that the climb was a theatrical distraction for a high-stakes crime.
Questions are mounting over who authorized the global broadcast and why the emergency protocols were not activated until Honnold had already descended. For those seeking the truth behind the “breathless” headlines, new evidence has surfaced that points to a shocking level of premeditation.
You can access the full report and the analyzed audio clips by clicking the link in the comments.

Authorities have confirmed that a formal investigation is under way into the global broadcast known as the “Safe Skyscraper” climb, after digital forensic specialists identified irregularities in the live transmission that was viewed by millions worldwide.

According to investigators, recovered audio from the original broadcast contains faint mechanical sounds and partially obscured voices that do not appear to match the climber’s position or movements at the time. Specialists say the sounds were subtle and could easily have gone unnoticed by viewers during the live stream.

The findings have raised questions about whether the feed may have been altered or delayed in real time, potentially preventing audiences and production staff from seeing what was actually happening on the side of the building.

Images showing climber Alex Honnold navigating the building’s distinctive circular exterior structures are now being treated as part of the evidentiary record. Investigators have also confirmed that engineers are examining sections of the facade close to the route used during the ascent, following preliminary indications of possible structural interference.

Officials would not confirm the nature of any suspected interference, but said the case has been escalated due to the scale of the broadcast and the potential safety risks involved.

One source familiar with the inquiry said the implications could be significant if the anomalies are verified, particularly if the climb was used to divert attention from other activity connected to the building.