🚨 THE JURY NEVER SAW THIS — NOW 75 PAGES OF NEWLY REVEALED EVIDENCE ARE CHANGING THE CONVERSATION AROUND KARMELO ANTHONY

New documents are shedding disturbing new light on the history prosecutors say surrounded Karmelo Anthony before the fatal stabbing of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf.

The 75-page filing includes photographs, videos and text messages that prosecutors sought to introduce as evidence.

Among the material:

🔫 Images appearing to show Anthony holding firearms.

🏠 A video prosecutors say shows him aiming a gun toward a home before running away.

⚠️ Messages allegedly containing threats involving guns, knives and violence.

💬 Texts in which prosecutors say Anthony described losing control when angry.

And perhaps most alarming, prosecutors say Anthony’s former girlfriend reported concerns about his behavior to school staff on the very day Austin Metcalf was killed.

According to the newly reported documents, Anthony allegedly sent messages that morning saying he was “on the verge.”

Hours later, at a high school track meet in Frisco, Texas, Austin Metcalf was fatally stabbed.

Anthony was later convicted of murder and sentenced to 35 years in prison. He has appealed the conviction, and his request for a new trial was recently denied.

But here’s what makes the newly revealed material so controversial:

The jury never heard much of it.

Prosecutors and defense attorneys had reached an agreement that kept evidence about Anthony’s alleged prior conduct — as well as damaging information about Austin Metcalf — away from the jury during the original trial.

Now that those records are becoming public, the debate surrounding the case is intensifying all over again.

What happened beneath that track-meet tent?

What did Anthony’s state of mind look like in the hours before the stabbing?

And could the evidence now emerging change the legal battle over his conviction?

Those questions remain at the center of his appeal.

One thing is certain: the public is now seeing a side of the case that jurors were never shown.

And the debate over what that evidence means has only just begun.

👇 Do you think this newly revealed evidence should have been presented to the jury?