BOAT CRASHES INTO CHANNEL MARKER: STEPHEN SCHNEIDER’S FINAL SECONDS UNDER SCRUTINY 

 BOAT CRASHES INTO CHANNEL MARKER: STEPHEN SCHNEIDER’S FINAL SECONDS UNDER SCRUTINY

The final moments before a devastating Barnegat Bay collision are now at the center of the case against 64-year-old Stephen Schneider, after prosecutors say his boat slammed into a wooden channel marker and sent two young grandchildren into the dark water.

The July 19 crash claimed the lives of 9-year-old Mya Golabek and her 7-year-old brother, Sigmund Paul Golabek. Schneider is facing two counts of reckless vessel homicide, along with charges related to allegedly operating a vessel under the influence and reckless operation.

May be an image of fishing, boat and jet skiA FAMILY RIDE THAT ENDED IN SECONDS

The family had gathered for dinner at MJ’s Restaurant in Bayville.

Afterward, Mya and Sigmund reportedly wanted to ride back to their grandparents’ home with Schneider and his wife rather than return on their parents’ boat.

Schneider was operating his approximately 30-foot Tidewater 280 on Barnegat Bay when it struck a wooden channel marker at around 9 p.m.

The impact threw both children from the boat.

Although they were wearing life jackets, the children were found face-down in the water. Schneider and his wife pulled them from the bay and began CPR before they were taken to a hospital, where both were pronounced dead.

May be an image of boat and textTHE BAC EVIDENCE

What happened immediately before the collision has become a central issue.

Schneider reportedly told investigators that he had consumed three beers during a two-hour dinner.

But prosecutors later revealed that his blood-alcohol concentration was approximately 0.16% — twice New Jersey’s legal limit of 0.08%.

Prosecutors argued that the result demonstrated a significant level of impairment at the time he chose to operate the vessel.

The defense, however, has indicated it intends to challenge aspects of the evidence, including the circumstances surrounding the BAC testing.

 WAS THE CHANNEL MARKER PROPERLY LIT?

One potentially important issue raised by Schneider’s defense involves the channel marker itself.

His attorney has questioned whether the marker was properly illuminated on the night of the collision.

That matters because the crash occurred after dark, and investigators are examining exactly what Schneider could or could not have seen as he approached the marker.

The defense has also said it wants an independent expert to review Schneider’s BAC evidence.

That does not establish that the marker caused the crash or that Schneider will ultimately prevail at trial.

It simply means the visibility and technical condition of the navigation marker are among the issues the defense intends to investigate.

 THE CHILDREN’S PARENTS MADE AN UNEXPECTED REQUEST

At Schneider’s detention hearing, prosecutors argued that he should remain jailed because of the seriousness of the allegations.

But the children’s parents asked the judge to release him.

Their attorney read a letter describing Schneider as a loving grandfather and saying the family needed him while they were grieving.

Judge Wendel Daniels ultimately approved Schneider’s conditional release pending trial. He was prohibited from operating a boat or motor vehicle while the case proceeds and must undergo further evaluation.

His next court appearance is scheduled for September 15.

 NOW INVESTIGATORS MUST RECONSTRUCT THE FINAL SECONDS

The case ultimately comes down to a sequence that lasted only moments:

A nighttime boat ride.

A fixed channel marker ahead.

An alleged BAC of 0.16%.

A collision.

Two children thrown into the water.

And now, investigators and attorneys are examining everything that happened before the impact.

How fast was the boat traveling?

What was Schneider’s exact course?

How visible was the marker?

What were the lighting and weather conditions?

And what role did alcohol impairment play?

Those questions will be critical as the case moves toward trial.

Schneider has been charged, not convicted, and the allegations against him will ultimately be tested in court.

For Mya and Sigmund’s family, however, the legal battle comes after an irreversible loss — two children who never made it home from a family boat ride.